Stolz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDWARD ROYCE STOLZ, II, No. 2:18-cv-1923-KJM-KJN Plaintiff, FINAL FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS ON DEFENDANT’S

v. SECOND MOTION TO ENFORCE TRAVELERS COMMERCIAL (ECF Nos. 105, 159, 160) INSURANCE COMPANY, et al. 15 Defendants. 16 This case arises out of a claim for insurance coverage under a homeowner’s policy issued by Travelers Commercial Insurance Company (“Travelers”). The house is located in El Dorado Hills, California, and plaintiff Edward Royce Stolz, II (“Stolz”) holds some property interest in it. The case has been significantly side-tracked by the withdrawal of two of Stolz’s attorneys—each citing their ethical duty of candor to the court as one of their reasons to withdraw, as well as multiple discovery disputes—which have largely emanated from Stolz’s abuse of the discovery process. The court now takes up Travelers’s second motion to enforce. (ECF Nos. 105, 158, 162.) Travelers alleges Stolz has consistently…