Stainer

(PC) Callins v. Stainer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20201:19-cv-00431California150 words

Trial Court Opinion

41.4970 UV VUtTtOL YAALY Lr NY MVVULIICEI Vy PHU Veni corey Payee +ViIs+

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 CARLTON R. CALLINS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00431-DAD-EPG (PC) Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: STIPULATED REQUEST FOR

v. DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 14] J. ESCUTIA, et al., (ECF No. 55) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, Carlton R. Callins, and Defendants Cervantes, Padilla, Lopez, Escutia, Guzman 18 and Pena, have filed a stipulation to dismiss all claims with prejudice. (ECF No. 45.) Pursuant 19 to the stipulation, the case has ended and the case is dismissed with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. 20 P.41(a)C1); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). 21

IS SO ORDERED.

22 23| Dated: _ April 28, 2020 [see ey

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28