Callejas

(PS) Hawkins v. Callejas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20202:20-cv-00156California866 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KET HAWKINGS III, No. 2:20-cv-0156 JAM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK

TO SEND MATERIALS FOR SERVICE

SACRAMENTO COUNTY AND REQUIRING SERVICE BY

DEPARTMENT OF CHILD AND UNITED STATES MARSHAL

FAMILY ADULT SERVICES, Defendant. 17 Plaintiff Ket Hawkings III is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Therein, plaintiff complain about a state court child custody proceeding. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s complaint alleges that plaintiff’s rights under the Indian…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.