(PC) Curry v. Sessions

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RYAN INDIANA CURRY, No. 2:20-cv-227-TLN-EFB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SESSIONS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 26, 2020, the court determined that plaintiff’s complaint had alleged, for screening purposes, viable Eighth Amendment claims against defendants Sanders, Sessions, Pyett, and Williams, but had not alleged any viable claims against any other defendants. ECF No. 7. The court informed plaintiff he could proceed with the viable claims only or file an amended complaint within 30 days. Id. Plaintiff has elected to proceed only with the viable claim against defendants Sanders, Sessions, Pyett, and Williams. ECF No. 13. Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that plaintiff’s claims against defendants Jones, Pimentel, Scott, Oram, and Pitts be dismissed without prejudice. These…