(PC) Hall v. County of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20201:18-cv-01678California7,474 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CURTIS HALL, 1:18-cv-01678-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

vs. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL BE DENIED AND THIS CASE

COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., PROCEED WITH PLAINTIFF’S

FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT CLAIM

Defendants. AGAINST DEFENDANT FRESNO

COUNTY, THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS

AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 8.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

21 I. BACKGROUND Curtis Hall (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 11, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On January 13, 2020, the court dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.