(PC) Hall v. County of Fresno
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20201:18-cv-01678California7,474 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CURTIS HALL, 1:18-cv-01678-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S
vs. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF
COUNSEL BE DENIED AND THIS CASE
COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., PROCEED WITH PLAINTIFF’S
FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT CLAIM
Defendants. AGAINST DEFENDANT FRESNO
COUNTY, THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS
AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED
WITH PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
STATE A CLAIM (ECF No. 8.)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN (14) DAYS
21 I. BACKGROUND Curtis Hall (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 11, 2018, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On January 13, 2020, the court dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with…