Villarreal

(PC) Howell v. Villarreal

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20201:19-cv-01178California536 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9 KAREEM J. HOWELL, Case No. 1:19-cv-01178-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT CERTAIN v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

S. VILLARREAL, et al.,

(ECF NOS. 1 & 11) Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE Kareem J. Howell (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on August 28, 2019. (ECF No. 14). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 11). The Court found that only the following claims should proceed past the screening stage: Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants S. Villarreal and A. Randolph for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and his claim against Defendant S. Villarreal for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.