Dahlin

Dahlin v. Frieborn

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20202:17-cv-02585California5,024 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES DAHLIN, et al., No. 2:17-cv-02585-MCE-AC Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ROSEMARY FRIEBORN, et al., Defendants. 16 Through the present action, Plaintiffs James and Kimberly Dahlin (the “Dahlins”), and Toby and Martina Tippets (the “Tippets,” and collectively with the Dahlins, “Plaintiffs”) assert eleven federal and state causes of action against various municipal and non-municipal Defendants stemming from the seizure of various items and 57 dogs from the Dahlins’ property, where they own and operate a dog breeding business.1 Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) was dismissed with leave to amend (Mem. and Order, ECF No. 99), and they subsequently filed the Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 103) (“SAC”). Presently before the Court are three individually briefed Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ SAC filed by the following groups of Defendants: (1) City of Auburn, Auburn Police Department, Community Service…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.