Martinez

(HC) Griffin v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20201:17-cv-01137California892 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT LEE GRIFFIN, Case No. 1:17-cv-01137-DAD-JDP Petitioner, INFORMATIONAL ORDER v. ECF No. 32 JOEL D. MARTINEZ, ORDER EXTENDING THE DEADLINE TO

SHOW CAUSE

Respondent. ECF No. 31

RESPONSE DUE IN THIRTY DAYS

17 Petitioner Robert Lee Griffin, a state prisoner without counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 30. On April 17, 2020, we issued an order to show cause why the amended petition should not be dismissed as untimely. ECF No. 31. In his response to our order to show cause, petitioner stated that he misunderstood the habeas requirements for timely filing. ECF No. 32. Accordingly, we provide petitioner with the following information and extend the deadline for him to show cause why his amended petition should not be dismissed as untimely. Discussion On June 25, 2018, we granted petitioner a stay of his petition under the Kelly procedure so that he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.