Cornwell

(PC) Sewell v. Cornwell

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20202:18-cv-02988California6,223 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN SEWELL, No. 2:18-cv-2988 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

A.CORNWELL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs. Before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend defendants’ motion be granted. BACKGROUND This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s complaint filed here on November 15, 2018. Plaintiff contends that in November 2017 he swallowed medication wrapped in rubber gloves, “bindles” of medication. He informed defendant Cornwell, a correctional officer, several times that he had swallowed the bindles and was experiencing chest and abdominal pain. Cornwell did not help plaintiff at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.