Goodpaster

(PC) Webster v. Goodpaster

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20202:20-cv-00595California1,249 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARK KEITH WEBSTER, No. 2:20-cv-0595-JAM-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

RACHAEL GOODPASTER, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a county inmate proceeding without counsel in this action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 2. As discussed below, his application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted but it is recommended that his complaint be dismissed without leave to amend. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis The court has reviewed the second of plaintiff’s applications (ECF No.2) and finds that it makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, plaintiff’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Screening I. Legal Standards Pursuant to § 1915(e)(2), the court must dismiss the case at any time if it determines the allegation of poverty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.