Hamilton

Hamilton v. Solano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20202:19-cv-01804California3,567 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRACI HAMILTON, et al., No. 2:19-cv-01804-MCE-KJN Plaintiffs, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COUNTY OF SOLANO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Traci Hamilton (“Traci”), individually and on behalf of her minor children (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), allege violations of federal constitutional law and state tort law by the City of Vacaville, County of Solano, and Solano County employees (collectively, “Defendants”). Presently before the Court are two Motions to Dismiss, filed by the following groups of Defendants: (1) City of Vacaville (“City”), ECF No. 4, and (2) County of Solano (“County”) and County employees Edward Miller, Katherine Medrano, Magie Chiang, and Rebecca Curcuro (collectively with County, “SC Defendants”), ECF No. 6. For the reasons that follow, both Motions are GRANTED.1 /// ///

1 Because oral argument would not be of material assistance, the Court ordered these matters submitted on the briefs. E.D. Cal. Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.