(PS) Conerly v. Superior Court of California County of Sacramento

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARINA CONERLY, et al. No. 2:20-cv-362-KJM-KJN PS Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS;

ASSOCIATED ORDER

v. (ECF No. 1, 10, 15) SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiffs filed this case on February 18, 2020, and paid the filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) Three days later, plaintiffs filed a motion to appoint counsel. (ECF No. 6.) On March 4, the court denied this request, and two days later plaintiffs moved for reconsideration. (ECF Nos. 9, 10.) The court has reviewed plaintiffs’ request, and finds no good cause for reconsideration. More importantly, however, a review of plaintiffs’ allegations and claims asserted demonstrates that the court has no subject matter jurisdiction to hear this case. Thus, the undersigned recommends this case be dismissed with prejudice.

1 Additionally, the court’s docket indicates that plaintiffs filed executions of summons on 26 February 21, 2020. On March 12, plaintiffs requested an entry of…