Perkins

(PC) Cresci v. Perkins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20201:20-cv-00412California586 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CARLO GUILIANO CRESCI, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00412-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR v. ) RECONSIDERATION OF THE COURT’S APRIL 7, 2020 ORDER DISREGARDING HIS REQUEST PERKINS, et al., ) FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE ) Defendants. ) [ECF No. 21] ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Carlo Guiliano Cresci is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, filed on April 28, 2020. Plaintiff seeks reconsideration of the Court’s April 7, 2020 order disregarding his request for judicial notice. Plaintiff’s motion must be denied. On April 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed seven documents entitled “Judicial/Administrative Notice to the Courts” which he contends demonstrate the unsanitary conditions at CSATF. (ECF Nos. 11-17.) On April…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.