Goss

(PC) Bland v. Goss

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20201:20-cv-00542California717 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA BLAND, Case No. 1:20-cv-00542-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISREGARDING PLAINTIFF’S

OBJECTION TO ATTORNEY GENERAL’S

v. REPRESENTATION OF DEFENDANTS AS

MOOT

GOSS, et al., (ECF No. 9) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Joshua Bland (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint has not yet been screened. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s “Notice of & Objection to Attorney General’s Representation of Defendants, inter alia,” filed April 27, 2020. (ECF No. 9.) In this filing, Plaintiff appears to object to the Attorney General’s representation of Defendants in this action, and argues that the Attorney General is instead obligated to represent him in this action. (Id.) The Court declines to provide a further summary of the frivolous arguments contained in the filing. The attached exhibits do not appear…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.