Arnold

(PC) Daniels v. Arnold

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 30, 20202:16-cv-00551California1,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TED DARNELL DANIELS, No. 2:16-cv-0551 MCE AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ERIC ARNOLD, Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action. By order filed April 22, 2020, and at plaintiff’s request, the deadlines were extended in this case for a period of ninety days. ECF No. 49. The discovery deadline was extended from May 1, 2020 to July 31, 2020, and the dispositive motion was extended from July 31, 2020 to October 30, 2020. Id. Prior to the filing of that order, plaintiff prepared and filed two discovery related motions. The first is a general request for the issuance of three blank subpoena forms. ECF No. 50. The second is a motion to compel discovery from sole defendant Lotersztain. ECF No. 51. In light of the extended deadlines in this case, plaintiff’s motion to compel discovery will be denied without prejudice to its later renewal if necessary. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.