(PS) Halousek v. United States Postal Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHEILA HALOUSEK, No. 2:19-cv-0588-MCE-KJN PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, (ECF No. 16)

ET AL.,

15 Defendants. 16 Presently pending before the court is defendant United States Postal Service’s (“USPS”) Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition, and the present motion was submitted without a hearing pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). The undersigned has considered defendant’s motion and the appropriate portions of the record in this case and, for the reasons stated below, recommends that defendant USPS’s Motion to Dismiss be granted, non-moving defendant Golden Eagle Market be dismissed, and plaintiff’s First Amended Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. /// //// //// 27 1 This motion is referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302(c)(21) for the entry of findings and recommendations. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). I. BACKGROUND2 …