(PS)Wallace

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CLEVAND WALLCE; RITA WALLACE, No. 2:20-cv-0501 TLN DB PS Plaintiffs, v. ORDER BUCKINGHAM PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, etc., 15 Defendants. 17 Plaintiffs Cleveland Wallace and Rita Wallace are proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiffs’ complaint and motions to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1-3.) Therein, plaintiffs complain about a conspiracy involving defendants’ property management company and several police departments. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiffs’ complaint is deficient. Accordingly, for the reasons stated below, plaintiffs’ complaint will be dismissed with leave to amend.…