Haggmark
Haggmark v. Les Schwab Tire Centers of Central California
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
WACO 1.497 UV VILE □□ WPAbWD MVVULTIGCEit LY PHM Payee +ViIst
1 2 3 4 5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 9] JESSE TYLER HAGGMARK, Case No. 1:19-cv-01742-NONE-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND REFLECT
v. VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF LES SCHWAB TIRE CENTERS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
CENTRAL CALIFORNIA,
(ECF No. 9) Defendant. 14 15 On May 1, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this matter with prejudice with each 16 party to bear its own costs and fees. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been 17 terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th 18 Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an award of costs or attorneys’ 19 fees. 20 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to assign a district judge to 21 this case for the purpose of closing the case and then to adjust the docket to reflect…