CHCF

(PC) Ausborn v. CHCF

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 1, 20202:19-cv-02220California274 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY AUSBORN, No. 2:19-cv-2220 CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND CHCF, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 On March 19, 2020, plaintiff’s pleadings were dismissed and thirty days leave to file a fourth amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed a fourth amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case; and IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.