Haskins

(PC) Webster v. Haskins

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20201:18-cv-01640California386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS WEBSTER, Case No. 1:18-cv-01640-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER LIFTING STAY OF PROCEEDINGS v. ORDER VACATING JUNE 5, 2020

SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND MAY

LOVE, et al., 21, 2020 PRE-SETTLEMENT

TELECONFERENCE

Defendants. (ECF No. 34) 16 Plaintiff Thomas Webster (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained under California Welfare Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). This action proceeds against Defendant Haskins for denial of adequate medical care in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. All parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF Nos. 22, 37.) On April 2, 2020, the Court identified this case as an appropriate case…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.