Kuku-Ojo

(PC) Foust v. Kuku-Ojo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20202:16-cv-02731California2,137 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL FOUST, No. 2:16-cv-2731 WBS AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

O. KUKU-OJO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the court is defendant’s motion for terminating sanctions. ECF No. 101. I. Procedural History This action proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint against defendant Kuku-Ojo for violation of plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment rights. ECF No. 41. On August 19, 2019, defendants filed a motion to compel based on plaintiff’s failure to respond to interrogatories, requests for admission, and requests for production. ECF No. 83. Although plaintiff filed numerous other documents, ECF Nos. 86-87, 89-94, he failed to respond to the motion to compel, despite receiving an extension of time, ECF No. 85. The motion to compel was granted and plaintiff was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.