Larosa
(PC) Lovest v. Larosa
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTWONE LOVEST, No. 2:19-cv-1060-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
RALPH DIAZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 15, 2020, the court determined that plaintiff’s complaint had alleged, for screening purposes, viable equal protection and retaliation claims against defendant LaRosa, but had not alleged any viable claims against any other defendants. ECF No. 20. The court informed plaintiff he could proceed with the viable claims only or file an amended complaint within 30 days. Id. Plaintiff has elected to proceed only with the viable claims against defendant LaRosa. ECF No. 21. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk shall randomly assign a United States District Judge to this case. ///// ///// 28 VEY PRINCE MVOC Ge PI Te AY ee