Martin
Martin v. Pfzifer
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20201:20-cv-00605California2,117 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LANCE R. MARTIN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00605-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSING
v. COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO
AMEND AS FRIVOLOUS AND DENYING
C. PFZIFER, et al., PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO
PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF
Defendants. FEES
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE
COURT TO REDESIGNATE THIS
MATTER AS A REGULAR CIVIL ACTION
AND RANDOMLY ASSIGN A UNITED
STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
(ECF No. 1, 2)
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY
DAYS
21 Lance R. Martin (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 22 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s complaint and an application to 23 proceed without prepayment of fees, filed April 29, 2020. 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / I. …