Martin

Martin v. Pfzifer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20201:20-cv-00605California2,117 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LANCE R. MARTIN, Case No. 1:20-cv-00605-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING

v. COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO

AMEND AS FRIVOLOUS AND DENYING

C. PFZIFER, et al., PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO

PROCEED WITHOUT PREPAYMENT OF

Defendants. FEES

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF THE

COURT TO REDESIGNATE THIS

MATTER AS A REGULAR CIVIL ACTION

AND RANDOMLY ASSIGN A UNITED

STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

(ECF No. 1, 2)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN THIRTY

DAYS

21 Lance R. Martin (“Plaintiff”) is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 22 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s complaint and an application to 23 proceed without prepayment of fees, filed April 29, 2020. 24 / / / 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 / / / I. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.