Diaz

(HC) Peterson v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20202:19-cv-01480California1,905 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RICHARD ANTHONY PETERSON, No. 2:19-cv-01480 WBS GGH P Petitioner, v. ORDER RALPH M. DIAZ, Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner has moved for reconsideration of the undersigned’s order denying his request for an emergency release on conditions/bail due to the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. ECF No. 37. As part of the reconsideration proceeding, the undersigned directed respondent to include in his briefing: whether petitioner would be released in 2020; whether petitioner was on a state created compassionate release list; and to describe the COVID-19 conditions at petitioner’s particular prison. ECF No. 40. Respondent timely did so on April 24, 2020. ECF No. 43. Petitioner has not filed a reply as the undersigned directed that he could. However, petitioner’s relatives have been filing “friend of the court” or “next friend” briefings and submittals. See ECF No. 38, 42, 44. To the extent that these filings can be considered declarations of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.