Martinez

(PC) L.C. Cunningham v. Martinez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20201:19-cv-01508California4,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

L.C. CUNNINGHAM, Case No. 1:19-cv-01508-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

v. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION

PROCEED ON PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM

M. MARTINEZ, et al., AGAINST DEFENDANT HARMAN FOR

FAILURE TO PROTECT IN VIOLATION

Defendants.

OF THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT AND ON

PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM AGAINST

DEFENDANT MARTINEZ FOR

VIOLATION OF THE FREE EXERCISE

CLAUSE OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT,

AND THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND

DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

(ECF NO. 12)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE

24 L.C. Cunningham (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 25 pauperis in this action filed on October 23,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.