Lake

(PC) Cagan v. Lake

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20201:19-cv-01710California2,344 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MAXCIME CAGAN, Case No. 1:19-cv-01710-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, v. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A

STEVEN LAKE, et al., CLAIM

Defendants. (ECF NO. 1)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN

DISTRICT JUDGE Maxcime Cagan (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on December 19, 2019. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened the complaint and found that it failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 7). The Court provided Plaintiff with applicable legal standards, explained why Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a claim, and gave Plaintiff leave to file a First Amended Complaint. (Id.). The Court also gave Plaintiff the option of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.