Lake
(PC) Cagan v. Lake
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20201:19-cv-01710California2,344 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MAXCIME CAGAN, Case No. 1:19-cv-01710-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, v. RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE
DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
STEVEN LAKE, et al., CLAIM
Defendants. (ECF NO. 1)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN
DISTRICT JUDGE Maxcime Cagan (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on December 19, 2019. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened the complaint and found that it failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 7). The Court provided Plaintiff with applicable legal standards, explained why Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a claim, and gave Plaintiff leave to file a First Amended Complaint. (Id.). The Court also gave Plaintiff the option of…