Docanto

(PC) Casey v. Docanto

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20201:20-cv-00420California2,697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JAMES ARTHUR CASEY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00420-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO v. ) RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE TO

THIS ACTION

M. DOCANTO, et al., ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION Defendants. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION ) FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) ) [ECF No. 12]

Plaintiff James Arthur Casey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed April 17, 2020. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.