Garcia

(PC) Holmes v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20201:19-cv-00555California415 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 VERNELL HOLMES, Case No. 1:19-cv-00555-JDP

Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS CASE

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

A. GARCIA, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE IN 30 DAYS

Defendants.

17 18 Plaintiff, a state inmate previously incarcerated at California Correctional Institution in Tehachapi, proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint was screened on October 30, 2019, and plaintiff was ordered to produce documents so that the court could order service. ECF No. 12. That order was returned as undeliverable on November 14, 2019. Under Local Rule 183(b), plaintiff’s change of address was due by January 24, 2020, in order for him to avoid dismissal for failure to prosecute. The court has not received an updated address or a response to its order. To manage its docket effectively, the court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.