Newsom

(PC) Cross v. Newsom

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20202:19-cv-02462California327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 QUINTIN R. CROSS, No. 2:19-cv-02462-CKD P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND GAVIN NEWSOM, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 By an order filed April 13, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to pay the filing fee within fourteen days and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. The allotted time period has now expired, and plaintiff has not paid the filing fee or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court randomly assign this matter to a district court judge. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.