Roberts

(PC) Scott v. Roberts

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20202:20-cv-00149California338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JASON SCOTT, No. 2:20-cv-0149 KJM AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER BARBARA ROBERTS, Judge, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On March 18, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.