(PS) Espana v. Road Runner Tow

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20202:19-cv-00475California1,287 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID ESPANA, No. 2:19-cv-00475-JAM-KJN PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’

ROAD RUNNER TOW, et al., MOTIONS TO DISMISS Defendants. (ECF Nos. 31, 32) 16 Presently before the court are defendants’ two motions to dismiss. (ECF Nos. 31, 32.)1 Plaintiff is currently incarcerated, and therefore, pursuant to Local Rule 230(l) (providing for 21 days) and Federal Civil Rule of Civil Procedure 6(d) (providing for an additional 3 days when served by mail), plaintiff was to respond to these motions within 24 days. Plaintiff did not respond by this deadline. The court extended the date for plaintiff to file an opposition, making the new deadline March 27, 2020. (ECF No. 33.) The court explicitly warned plaintiff that “plaintiff’s failure to file the required oppositions shall constitute an additional ground for, and plaintiff’s consent to, the imposition of appropriate sanctions,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.