Sims

(PS) Petersen v. Sims

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20201:19-cv-00138California194 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

41.497 VV VULVIOULAALY LS NY PVVULIICII Vo PHU VUsivicy Payee +ViIs+

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 || KYLE PETERSEN, No. 1:19-cv-00138-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EX PARTE APPLICATION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

v. OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO DISMISS 13 || ANTHONY SIMS, JR. and NICHOLAS (ECF No. 52)

TORRES,

14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, Kyle Petersen, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 || brought pursuant to Bivens y. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Before the 19 || Court is Plaintiff’s ex parte application for an extension of time to respond to Defendants’ motion to 20 || dismiss (ECF No. 52). Having considered the application, and for good cause shown, IT IS ORDERED that the ex parte application (ECF No. 52) is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall file 22 || his opposition to Defendants’ motion to dismiss no later than July 6, 2020.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 Dated: …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.