Fine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIENGKHAM SINGANONH, No. 2:18-cv-1824 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

R. FINE, et al.,

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss, ECF No. 33, and plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint, ECF No. 38. I. Procedural History This case proceeds on plaintiff’s first amended complaint. ECF No. 14. On screening, plaintiff’s claims against Peery, Hanson, Lee, Voong, Cagle, Gamberg, Hardwood, Rodriguez, and Stalter and the tort claims against Fine were dismissed without leave to amend, while the case proceeded against Fine on the claims of excessive force and retaliation. ECF Nos. 15, 28. Defendant now moves to dismiss the remaining claims on the ground that they are barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). ECF No. 33. Plaintiff opposes the motion, ECF…