Alencastre

(PC) Khouanmany v. Alencastre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 6, 20202:17-cv-01326California1,334 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 VILAYCHITH KHOUANMANY, No. 2:17-cv-1326-TLN-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNITED STATES MARSHALS, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with an action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). Plaintiff currently proceeds on her second amended complaint (ECF No. 72) against defendant Alencastre with Eighth Amendment claims for sexual assaults alleged to have occurred on February 26, 2016, March 1, 2016, and March 11, 2016. See ECF No. 73; ECF No. 106 at 3 n.3; ECF No. 124 at 2 (Screening orders identifying and narrowing plaintiff’s claims). On October 21, 2019, plaintiff filed a motion seeking to add defendant Kevin Deppe as a defendant. ECF No. 107. The court interpreted plaintiff’s motion as one to substitute defendant Alencastre with Kevin Deppe and granted leave to amend for this sole purpose. ECF No. 124. On February 18, 2020,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.