Chappuis

(PC) Cruz v. Chappuis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20201:19-cv-01016California915 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GUILLERMO TRUJILLO CRUZ, ) Case No. 1:19-cv-01016-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S SECOND v. ) MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND

DISMISSING ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

) M. CHAPPUIS, FOR FAILURE TO PAY THE $400.00 FILING ) FEE Defendant. ) ) [ECF No. 18] )

Plaintiff Guillermo Trujillo Cruz is appearing pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 14, 2019, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations recommending that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied because he has suffered three or more strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and Plaintiff be required to pay the $400.00 filing fee in full. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff filed objections on September 10, 2019. (ECF No. 9.) On December 20, 2019, the undersigned adopted the Findings and Recommendations in full and ordered Plaintiff to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.