Woodfill

(PC) Ruiz v. Woodfill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20202:20-cv-00205California753 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ROGELIO MAY RUIZ, No. 2:20-cv-0205 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER D. WOODFILL, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has requested an extension of time to file objections as well as appointment of both counsel and an interpreter. Plaintiff requests an unspecified extension of time to file objections to Findings and Recommendations. ECF No. 13 at 1. It is unclear from the motion whether plaintiff is seeking an extension of the time to object to the April 20, 2020 Findings and Recommendations or to extend the re-opened period for objections to the February 3, 2020 Findings and Recommendations. However, based on the date of the motion it appears he is seeking to extend the time to object to the April 20, 2020 Findings and Recommendations. Regardless, the motion will be granted as to both deadlines. Plaintiff shall have until June 1, 2020, to file objections to both…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.