Shnider

(HC) Kibunguchy v. Shnider

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 7, 20202:20-cv-00495California1,880 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRIS WAMALWA KIBUNGUCHY, No. 2:20-cv-0495 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SMY SHNIDER, et al., Respondents. 16 Petitioner is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se. He is currently on parole at Atascadero State Hospital (“ASH”). Petitioner originally filed this action as a habeas petition. (ECF No. 1.) He also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 7.) Shortly thereafter, petitioner filed a civil rights complaint. (ECF No. 9.) A review of both pleadings shows that this case is more appropriately a civil rights case. However, for the reasons set forth below, plaintiff’s claim is not cognizable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and should be dismissed without leave to amend. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Petitioner filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis which, while not entirely clear, indicates he has sufficient funds to pay the filing fee in this action. (ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.