Pfeiffer

(HC) Young v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20201:18-cv-01339California1,098 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 HOWARD YOUNG, No. 1:18-cv-01339-DAD-JDP (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

C. PFEIFFER, (Doc. No. 48) Respondent.

16 Petitioner Howard Young is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 13, 2020, the court adopted in full the February 26, 2020 findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge. (Doc. Nos. 41, 46.) In that order, the court granted respondent’s motion to dismiss, denied petitioner federal habeas relief, and closed the case. (Doc. No. 46.) On May 4, 2020, petitioner moved for reconsideration of the final judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60. (Doc. No. 48.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) governs the reconsideration of final…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.