Burnes

(PC) Henley v. Burnes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20201:19-cv-01101California549 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ZURI HENLEY, No. 1:19-cv-01101-DAD-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

BURNES, et al., ACTION Defendants. (Doc. No. 13) 16 17 Plaintiff Zuri Henley is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 9, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that the action be dismissed due to plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing suit as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act (“PLRA”). (Doc. No. 13.) The magistrate judge noted that plaintiff had admitted, both in his first amended complaint and in his response to the court’s February 6, 2020 order to show cause why the action 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.