Starr

(PC) White-Soto v. Starr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20201:19-cv-00457California641 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 YASYN WHITE-SOTO, Case No. 1:19-cv-00457-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

SECOND MOTION TO MODIFY

v. DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER STARR, et al., (ECF No. 28) Defendants. Exhaustion Motion Deadline: June 18, 2020 14 Plaintiff Yasyn White-Soto (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s complaint against Defendant Starr for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and retaliation in violation of the First Amendment. Pursuant to the Court’s January 9, 2020 Discovery and Scheduling Order, (ECF No. 21), and April 6, 2020 order granting Defendant’s ex parte motion to modify discovery and scheduling order, (ECF No. 25), the deadline for filing motions for summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies is May 9, 2020. On May 8, 2020,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.