Agundez

(PC) Davis v. Agundez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20201:20-cv-00640California386 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORNELL DAVIS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00640-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY MOTION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. SHOULD NOT BE DENIED

A. AGUNDEZ, et al., (Doc. 2)

Defendants. 21-DAY DEADLINE 16 Plaintiff has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 2.) According to his prison trust account statement, on January 27, 2020, Plaintiff received a settlement check in the amount of $3,500. (Doc. 5.) As of April 17, 2020, Plaintiff had $1,194.68 in his trust account. This is more than enough to pay the $400 filing fee in this action. Proceeding “in forma pauperis is a privilege not a right.” Smart v. Heinze, 347 F.2d 114, 116 (9th Cir. 1965). While a party need not be completely destitute to proceed IFP, Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., 335 U.S. 331, 339-40 (1948), “‘the same even-handed care must be employed to assure that federal funds are not squandered to underwrite, at public…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.