Pfeiffer

(PC) Freeman v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20201:20-cv-00320California965 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TRAVON LEON FREEMAN, No. 1:20-cv-00320-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR RECONSIDERATION

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al., (Doc. No. 12) Defendants.

16 Plaintiff Travon Leon Freeman is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 15, 2020, the court adopted in full the March 4, 2020 findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge. (Doc. Nos. 5, 9.) In that order, the court denied plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and directed him to pay the required $400.00 filing fee in order to proceed with the action. (Doc. No. 9.) On April 30, 2020, plaintiff moved for reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)1 and filed notice of an appeal of the order to the Ninth Circuit. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.