Domino

Domino v. California Correctional Health Care Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 8, 20201:19-cv-01790California5,470 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 JUNE M. DOMINO, Ph.D., Case No. 1:19-cv-01790-NONE-SKO 9 Plaintiff, SECOND SCREENING ORDER v. (Doc. 10) CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL HEALTH CARE SERVICES, et al., 21-DAY DEADLINE 12 Defendants. /

14 Plaintiff June M. Domino, Ph.D., proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint on December 23, 2019, against California Correctional Healthcare Services and “AFSCME Local 2620.” (Docs. 1–3.) In her original complaint, Plaintiff purported to allege claims for employment discrimination under unspecified “Federal Statutes” and “Federal Treaties.” (Id.) She demanded “$44 Million” in damages. (Doc. 1-1.) Plaintiff also filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on December 27, 2019. On March 3, 2020, the Complaint was screened, and the undersigned found that it failed to state a cognizable federal claim. (Doc. 8.) Plaintiff was provided with the applicable legal standards so that she could determine if she would like to pursue her case and was granted…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.