Stock
Stock v. Stanislaus County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 LISA STOCK, Case No. 1:19-cv-01598-NONE-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED STANISLAUS COUNTY, et al., FOR PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDER
Defendants. (Doc. 5)
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
15 On November 8, 2019, Plaintiff filed the complaint in this case against Defendants. (Doc. 16 1.) Plaintiff also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on December 16, 17 2019. (Docs. 2, 4.) 18 On January 14, 2020, the Court issued an order finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to 19 state any cognizable claims and granting leave until February 4, 2020, for Plaintiff to file an 20 amended complaint. (Doc. 5.) To date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or requested 21 an extension of time in which to do so. 22 The Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, 23 corresponding with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil…