Segriest

(PC) Apodaca v. Segriest

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20201:19-cv-01781California1,255 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 AARON L. APODACA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01781-JDP

Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER

v. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT DUE IN

SIXTY DAYS

NANCY SEGRIEST, et al., ECF No. 1 Defendants.

Plaintiff Aaron L. Apodaca is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint, ECF No. 1, is before the court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff seeks to bring a lawsuit on behalf of himself and twenty-four other inmates for a wide variety of claims related to their medical care. Plaintiff has failed to state a claim and will be given leave to amend. SCREENING AND PLEADING REQUIREMENTS A complaint must contain a short and plain statement that plaintiff is entitled to relief, Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2), and provide “enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face,” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). The plausibility…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.