Childres

(PC) Dustin v. Childres

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20201:20-cv-00422California1,537 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

D. DUSTIN, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00422-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. ) RECOMMENDING MOTION TO PROCEED IN

FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED

CHILDRES, et al., ) ) [ECF Nos. 2, 8] Defendants. ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff D. Dustin is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 18, 2020, Plaintiff filed the instant action in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. On March 23, 2020, the action was transferred to this Court. Although Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the Northern District on March 18, 2020 (ECF No. 2), it was not complete or signed under penalty of perjury by Plaintiff. Therefore, on March 24, 2020, the Court directed Plaintiff to submit a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.