Wolf

(HC) Zambrano v. Wolf

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20201:20-cv-00595California436 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARCIAL BRAVO ZAMBRANO, et al., No. 1:20-cv-00595-DAD-JLT (HC) Petitioners, v. ORDER GIVING EFFECT TO PETITIONER

ZAMBRANO AND RESPONDENTS’

CHAD F. WOLF, et al., STIPULATION AND STAYING THIS

MATTER AS TO PETITIONER ZAMBRANO

Respondents. (Doc. No. 4)

17 On April 24, 2020, petitioners Marcial Bravo Zambrano, Jorge Villalobos, and Michael Spitzauer (collectively, “petitioners”) filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus seeking their release from confinement. (Doc. No. 1.) Therein, petitioners contend that their continued confinement at Taft Correctional Institution during the ongoing COVID-19 global pandemic is a violation of their rights under the Due Process Clause of Fifth Amendment. (Id. at 5–6.) On April 27, 2020, the court set a briefing schedule, directing the government to respond to the petition by a May 11, 2020. (Doc. No. 2.) On May 8, 2020, petitioner Zambrano and respondents filed a stipulation,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.