Pfeiffer
(PC) Smith v. Pfeiffer
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARMAAL SMITH, Case No. 1:19-cv-00437-NONE-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al.,
RESPONSE DUE IN THIRTY DAYS
Defendants.
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SERVICE ECF No. 13 18 On December 10, 2019, the court granted plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint and ordered plaintiff to file his first amended compliant within thirty days. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Thus, the court will order plaintiff to show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for…