Pfeiffer

(PC) Smith v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20201:19-cv-00437California448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARMAAL SMITH, Case No. 1:19-cv-00437-NONE-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE IN THIRTY DAYS

Defendants.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SERVICE ECF No. 13 18 On December 10, 2019, the court granted plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint and ordered plaintiff to file his first amended compliant within thirty days. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Thus, the court will order plaintiff to show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with a court order. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.