Mendoza

Mendoza v. Macy's Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 11, 20201:19-cv-01156California636 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 RENEE C. MENDOZA, Case No. 1:19-cv-01156-DAD-SKO Plaintiff, SECOND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE v. WHY THE ACTION SHOULD NOT BE MACY’S INC., DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S

Defendant. ORDER (Doc. 12) FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 15 On August 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed the complaint in this case against Defendant. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff also filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, which was granted on September 4, 2019. (Docs. 2, 3.) On September 20, 2019, the Court issued an order finding that Plaintiff’s complaint failed to state any cognizable claims and granting leave until October 11, 2019, for Plaintiff to file an amended complaint. (Doc. 4.) Plaintiff filed a request for an extension of time to file her amended complaint, and the Court granted the request and allowed Plaintiff until…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.