(SS) Urrabazo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 12, 20201:19-cv-00248California4,628 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DAVID MALDONADO URRABAZO, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-0248 - JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER REMANDING THE ACTION PURSUANT ) TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) v. ) ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT IN COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, ) FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF DAVID MALDONADO ) URRABAZO AND AGAINST DEFENDANT, THE Defendant. ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY ) )

David Maldonado Urrabazo asserts he is entitled to a period of disability, disability insurance benefits, and supplemental security income under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff argues the administrative law judge erred in evaluating his subjective statements and determining the date he became disabled. For the reasons set forth below, the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). BACKGROUND In January 2011, Plaintiff filed his applications for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.